Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theology. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

Angel or Alien?

A customized search engine to shed light on which manner of cosmological visitor.

Drawing on various Judaic, Christian and Muslim primary sources as well as fan wikias, message boards, Dante, X-File script archives, various Spielberg scripts, Neon Genesis Evangelion scripts, Scientology, The Chariots of the Gods, Guardian Angel and Alien Abduction testimonials, Sacred Texts dot org and the Folk Texts site.

Thursday, June 2, 2011

Monday, January 24, 2011

Illustrations to Dante's "Divine Comedy" by William Blake

"The Wood of the Self-Murderers: The Harpies and the Suicides"



Sunday, September 19, 2010

Proclus Diadochus - On The Sacred Art (411-485 AD)

Source.

Another interesting description of pagan and neoplatonic theology.

Proclus Diadochus - On the Signs of Divine Possession (411-485 AD)

Source.

Neoplatonism is, among other more obvious, archaically celebrated things, the speculative, pagan, magic and theological gutters of the thought experiment that begins well before Plato and finds utterance in sources well beyond The West, but that abets its "spirituality." Below is a tract which describes the appearance of a God, a recognition aided by visible occurrence, related both to poetic inspiration and one's relative state of grace before, amongst nature. Preserved in Byzantine, Christian writer Psellus’ text: Accusation against Michael Cerularius before the Synod.


"He [i.e. Proclus] speaks first about the differences which separate the so-called Divine Powers, how some are more material and others more immaterial, some joyous (hilarai) and others solemn (embritheis), some arrive along with daemons and others arrive pure. Straight afterwards he goes on to the proper conditions for invocation: the places in which it occurs, about those men and women who see the Divine Light, and about the divine gestures (schêmatôn) and signs (sunthêmatôn) they display. In this way he gets around to the Theagogies of divine inspiration (tas entheastikas theagôgias)[a theagôgia is a drawing in or drawing down of the divine]. "Of which, " he says "some act on inanimate objects and others on animate beings: some on those which are rational, others on the irrational ones. Inanimate objects, " he continues "are often filled with Divine Light, like the statues which give oracles under the inspiration (epipnoias) of one of the Gods or Good Daemons. So too, there are men who are possessed and who receive a Divine Spirit (pneuma theion). Some receive it spontaneously, like those who are said to be ‘seized by God’ (theolêptoi), either at particular times, or intermittently and on occasion. There are others who work themselves up into a state of inspiration (entheasmôn) by deliberate actions, like the prophetess at Delphi when she sits over the chasm, and others who drink from divinatory water". Next, after having said what they have to do [i. e. to gain divine inspiration], he continues "When these things occur, then in order for a Theagogy and an inspiration (epipnoian) to take effect, they must be accompanied by a change in consciousness (parallaxia tês dianoias). When divine inspiration (entheasmôn) comes there are some cases where the possessed (tôn katochôn) become completely besides themselves and unconscious of themselves (existamenôn…kai oudamôs heautois parakolouthountôn). But there are others where, in some remarkable manner, they maintain consciousness. In these cases it is possible for the subject to work the Theagogy on himself, and when he receives the inspiration (epipnoian), is aware of what it [i.e. the Divine Power] does and what it says, and what he has to do release the mechanism [of possession](pothen dei apoluein to kinoun). However, when the loss of consciousness (ekstaseôs) is total, it is essential that someone in full command of his faculties assists the possessed". Then, after many details about the different kinds of Theagogy, he finally concludes: "It is necessary to begin by removing all the obstacles blocking the arrival of the Gods and to impose an absolute calm around ourselves in order that the manifestation of the Spirits (pneumata) we invoke takes place without tumult and in peace (atarachos kai meta galênês)". He adds further "The manifestations of the Gods are often accompanied by material Spirits which arrive and move with a certain degree of violence, and which the weaker mediums cannot withstand."

Wednesday, September 15, 2010

Heidegger Online (in English Translation)


"Heraclitus" [1966-1967] - Martin Heidegger
Heidegger's seminar on Heraclitus.

"Letter on "Humanism" [1949] - Martin Heidegger
Heidegger's famous essay in English translation.

"Nietzsche's Word, "God is Dead." - Martin Heidegger
Complete text of Martin Heidegger's essay on Nietzsche's announcement that "God is dead" (cf. The Gay Science).

"Parmenides" [1942-1943] - Martin Heidegger
Heidegger's course on Parmenides.

"Who is Nietzsche's Zarathustra?" - Martin Heidegger

Natural Science and Metaphysics - Martin Heidegger
An essay by Martin Heidegger on the dispositions underlying metaphysics (Aristotle), and modern natural science (Newton, Descartes).
"Nietzsche's Word: GOD IS DEAD" [Holzwege] - Martin Heidegger
A second translation of this important work.

The Self Assertion of the German University 1933 - Martin Heidegger
Martin Heidegger's [in]famous "Rectoratsrede" or "Rector's inaugural address", given in 1933. A careful reading of this speech is essential for anyone trying to understand the early philosophy of Heidegger, and why he eventually withdrew from politics.

Davos 1929, Confrontation with Cassirer re Kant - Martin Heidegger, Ernst Cassirer
A written transcript of the the Heidegger-Cassirer debate in Davos, Switzerland in 1929 regarding the question of Kant and "neo-Kantianism."

Der Spiegel Interview 1966 (English translation): - Martin Heidegger (interview 1966)
This is the famous "Der Spiegel Interview" from 1966 in which Heidegger discusses the current crisis of nihilism and his rejection of some kind of fusion of East and West. A return to, and a resuscitation of the Western Tradition is here anticipated as essential. Heidegger also here gives some further information which may help one to think about his motives in 1933 and thereafter.

Friday, September 10, 2010

The Consolation of Philosophy, by Boethius

In full.

As well as being one of Dante' major sources for his work, and likely the last work of classical, medieval philosophy, The Consolation of Philosophy is a contemplation of fate by a man brought down by personal and political treachery, an ambitious example of prison literature.

Friday, September 3, 2010

On the Concept of History - Walter Benjamin (1940)

Available online, in full.

One feels few writers have appeared besides Benjamin to have such a sensitivity for the breadth and quality of issues that needed to be addressed by Marxism for any Marxist-influenced thought to continue to have any legitimacy, beyond the inert barbarism of force, proletariat in name only, of Stalinism and its successors.

Paradoxically, the realpolitik of Marxism, always Marx's professed aims of his "theory" (not to interpret the world, but to change it), was the aspect of Marxism that stopped it dead in its tracks. The actual Marxist (-Leninist) state became incapable of interpreting the course of events in any way other than to paroxysm in knee-jerk, farcical enactments of its own party line, whether those solutions rang true or untrue before the tactical dictates of time: a petrified totalitarianism. As a result, its economy parodied liberalism (i.e. Napoleon) at its most appallingly imperialistic (having no example of economy of its own, only a critique), and the barbarity of its anti-humanism reached fiats of slaughter only debatably second to that of Fascism.

Paul Chan - My Birds . . . Trash . . . The Future.
The immediate problem that put Benjamin so far outside the purview of (and even hope for detection from) his Western Marxist contemporaries was that he recognized some sort of engagement needed to happen between Historicity and myth. When History was continuously being rewritten to suit the aims of the powerful, one could not, as dialectical Marxism seemed to rely on, posit simply that, on the on hand, the bourgeoisie conceptualization of time was ahistoric, and, on the other hand, an absolutely unequivocal discipline of Historicity existed.

Compounded with this problem was Marxist intellectuals own cupidity in relying on prognostication: that a salvation in the form of the total revolution would resolve "contradiction." Rather than perform the tortuous gymnastics needed to deny that myth, a literary trope even, was being invoked in these claims, or to dismiss the yearning inherit in the discipline of history, or worse (from a Marxist lens), to disavow history in favor of a transcendental, out-of-time conception of timeless fate (as in Heidegger), Benjamin begins to give an account of Historicity, expressly sensitive to myth, that includes the avowal of the mythic themes invoked in any accessing of the past, part and parcel of the writing of any history.

He begins to address the actual theological and mythic underpinnings of the writing of history, not to find the project out as an absurdity, but to flesh out its serious aims, those necessary to our cognitive and humane survival. He writes an actual myth, a myth that posits body and public before the forces of its actual gods, who are, in fact, non-deities: progress, labour, organization, power (capital) and the future.
Paul Chan - My Birds . . . Trash . . . The Future.

That is, he revisits Marx to save what is salvageable in Marx but needing articulation in the light of the  present--the present, which is always a surprise. Not accidentally, then, one of the themes that take relief in this concept of a cumulative, progressive (not transcendent, timeless) history is: garbage. But the dustbin of history (Marx's phrase) is not, precisely, just oblivion. It is the storage of ruins by which, in a process akin to the archaeological dig, we may yet illuminate our way to the future. It is, then, a myth for the progressive. At that, it is only marginally an optimistic one.

Perhaps its most serious philosophical critique lies in the sketch of a world of facts-- a view given articulation in the 20th century famously by Wittgenstein--rather than one of base materials. This is where Liberalism consistently outpaces radicals, in political terms: is it a fact, does it yield real world feedback capable of being reduplicated in real time? Or is it a theory, strictly surface interpretation, in the mode of detail-oriented, world-renouncing monks? A question I am really not equipped to deal with but recognize it is there; and for radicals: The Begging Question.
Paul Chan - My Birds . . . Trash . . . The Future.

Objections aside, this is the climate and background I imagine to have been part of the writing of this mesmerizing, intellectually fervid document. To my mind, it is to seek in a history grounded in base materials (history's trash) our fate, but interpreted backwards through history's long train of wrecks.

A Panegyric upon Abraham by Sören Kierkegaard

Source.

Chapter 1 of Fear and Trembling includes a negative theology account of faith; that is to say: a theological analogy for meaninglessness.

The Myth of Sysiphus by Albert Camus

Available online, in full.

Eichmann in Jerusalem: a Report on the Banality of Evil


What I find, perhaps, the most haunting criticism of Hannah Arendt's compelling characterization of evil within modernity is the charge that, Arendt having mostly observed the trial of Eichmann before he is to testify, the philosophical writer was not present to witness the more forceful aspects of his personality, exhibited during his defense.

For one, in reading parts of the transcripts, Eichmann's attempts to mystify his own accountability by drawing such an elaborate, labyrinthine picture of Nazi bureaucracy might easily be construed as an active strategy of a lively, even megalomaniacal mind engaged in the business of the will and survival (Nazi themes). This would hardly suit the portrait of the blase spirit of bureaucratic automaton giving platitudes after the defeat of his leaders. Even his deference to superiors in the immediate courtroom has a manipulative aspect.

That is not a criticism of Arendt's basic premise: but a way of reading this *accepted* account (accepted at least in the post-war West) that draws her themes in a sharper, more critical relief. This is, after all, one of the few completely secular accounts of the existence of evil, outside of theology, or at least outside of a theology with an active, living God.

One should not forget that the Holocaust was the first fully globally visible attempt, on the part of a fully technologically modernized state, to bring all the instruments of bureaucratic rationalization and scientific advance to bear upon the systematic extermination of a peoples. In that, that it happened, does not subtract from the violence and atrocities committed and currently being committed on other human populations.

Most of Eichmann in Jerusalem (with a page irritatingly withdrawn here or there) is available online at google books.

The transcripts from Eichmann's trials are available in full online.

Original articles Arendt wrote for the New Yorker, covering the Eichmann trial: part one, part two, part three, part four, and part five are available from the New Yorker's archives.

from The Confessions of St. Augustine - Formlessness

 St. Augustine presents his ideas of Formlessness in Book 12 of The Confessions.


Chapter III.-Of the Darkness Upon the Deep, and of the Invisible and Formless Earth.

3. And truly this earth was invisible and formless, 999 and there was I know not what profundity of the deep upon which there was no light, 1000 because it had no form. Therefore didst Thou command that it should be written, that darkness was upon the face of the deep; what else was it than the absence of light? 1001 For had there been light, where should it have been save by being above all, showing itself aloft, and enlightening? Where, therefore, light was as yet not, why was it that darkness was present, unless because light was absent? Darkness therefore was upon it, because the light above was absent; as silence is there present where sound is not. And what is it to have silence there, but not to have sound there? Hast not Thou, O Lord, taught this soul which confesseth unto Thee? Hast not Thou taught me, O Lord, that before Thou didst form and separate this formless matter, there was nothing, neither colour, nor figure, nor body, nor spirit? Yet not altogether nothing; there was a certain formlessness without any shape.

Chapter IV.-From the Formlessness of Matter, the Beautiful World Has Arisen.

4. What, then, should it be called, that even in some ways it might be conveyed to those of duller mind, save by some conventional word? But what, in all parts of the world, can be found nearer to a total formlessness than the earth and! the deep? For, from their being of the lowest position, they are less beautiful than are the other higher parts, all transparent and shining. Why, therefore, may I not consider the formlessness of matter-which Thou hadst created without shape, whereof to make this shapely world-to be fittingly intimated unto men by the name of earth invisible and formless?

Chapter V.-What May Have Been the Form of Matter.
   5. So that when herein thought seeketh what the sense may arrive at, and saith to itself, "It is no intelligible form, such as life or justice, because it is the matter of bodies; nor perceptible by the senses, because in the invisible and formless there is nothing which can be seen and felt;-while human thought saith these things to itself, it may endeavour either to know it by being ignorant, or by knowing it to be ignorant.

Chapter VI.-He Confesses that at One Time He Himself Thought Erroneously of Matter.

6. But were I, O Lord, by my mouth and by my pen to confess unto Thee the whole, whatever Thou hast taught me concerning that matter, the name of which hearing beforehand, and not understanding (they who could not understand it telling me of it), I conceived 1002 it as having innumerable and varied forms. And therefore did I not conceive it; my mind revolved in disturbed order foul and horrible "forms," but yet "forms;" and I called it formless, not that it lacked form, but because it had such as, did it appear, my mind would turn from, as unwonted and incongruous, and at which human weakness would be disturbed. But even that which I did conceive was formless, not by the privation of all form, but in comparison of more beautiful forms; and true reason persuaded me that I ought altogether to remove from it all remnants of any form whatever, if I wished to conceive matter wholly without form; and I could not. For sooner could I imagine that that which should be deprived of all form was not at all, than conceive anything between form and nothing,-neither formed, nor nothing, formless, nearly nothing. And my mind hence ceased to question my spirit, filled (as it was) with the images of formed bodies, and changing and varying them according to its will; and I applied myself to the bodies themselves, and looked more deeply into their mutability, by which they cease to be what they had. been, and begin to be what they were not; and this same transit from form unto form I have looked upon to be through some formless condition, not through a very nothing; but I desired to know, not to guess. And if my voice and my pen should confess the whole unto Thee, whatsoever knots Thou hast untied for me concerning this question, who of my readers would endure to take in the whole? Nor yet, therefore, shall my heart cease to give Thee honour, and a song of praise, for those things which it is not able to express. For the mutability of mutable things is itself capable of all those forms into which mutable things are changed. And this mutability, what is it? Is it soul? Is it body? Is it the outer appearance of soul or body? Could it be said, "Nothing were something," and "That which is, is not," I would say that this were it; and yet in some manner was it already, since it could receive these visible and compound shapes.

Chapter VII.-Out of Nothing God Made Heaven and Earth.

   7. And whence and in what manner was this, unless from Thee, from whom are all things, in so far as they are? But by how much the farther from Thee, so much the more unlike unto Thee; for it is not distance of place. Thou, therefore, O Lord, who art not one thing in one place, and otherwise in another, but the Self-same, and the Self-same, and the Self-same, 1003 Holy, Holy, Holy, Lord God-Almighty, didst in the beginning, 1004 which is of Thee, in Thy Wisdom, which was born of Thy Substance, create something, and that out of nothing. 1005 For Thou didst create heaven and earth, not out of Thyself, for then they would be equal to Thine Only-begotten, and thereby even to Thee; 1006 and in no wise would it be right that anything should be equal to Thee which was not of Thee. And aught else except Thee there was not whence Thou mightest create these things, O God, One Trinity, and Trine Unity; and, therefore, out of nothing didst Thou create heaven and earth,-a great thing and a small,because Thou art Almighty and Good, to make all things good, even the great heaven and the I small earth. Thou wast, and there was nought else from which Thou didst create heaven and earth; two such things, one near unto Thee, the other near to nothing, 1007-one to which Thou shouldest be superior, the other to which nothing should be inferior.

Followers